If you haven't and you'd like to, please don't take what I'm about to say into consideration.. This is just my opinion upon thousands who have loved the movie...
Don't read ahead if you haven't seen this movie!!
I thought it was okay, though I didn't love-love it. Phillip Seymore Hoffman, who played the gay-writer Truman Capote did a great job, for sure. Though I didn't think he deserved a best actors award. His part was good, though I wasn't blown away by it.
For one, I think I was most upset at how Capote used one of the prisoners to get a 'good story' out of him. He told one of the prisoners "I'm your friend" constantly and "I am writing a book about what a good person you are." After years of visiting this one prisoner and forming what you really think is a strong friendship, the prisoner is sent to hang and requests that Truman Capote, his friend, comes to say goodbye.
Truman says he doesnt want anything to do with him. He has named his book 'In Cold Blood' - about the viscious murder of a Kansas family, detailing just how vulgar the two prisoners are.
His so called friend, the prisoner is upset and asks Truman "Did you really name your book that? I thought you were going to help us.." to which Truman replies "I'm your friend. My book doesnt have a title yet and I wouldn't lie to you.."
When the death penalty is appealed, Truman Capote starts getting worried. He needs the murderers to hang, to have the perfect ending for his book... Some friend.
The prisoners are sent to hang and Capote arrives with his "Your my best friend and I did everything I can" teary speech (But of course, that is utter crap!)
He watches them hang, returns to his hotel where he calls his friend Harper Lee and tells her how dreadful it was and how he did everything he could... to which Harper replies "No you didn't!"
Sorry, I have given so much of it away, but I can't fall inlove with a movie based on someone as un-compassionate as him. I feel sorry for his troubles he had in life, though I do not see him as a great man for writing a book, by betraying others.
I also understand that to write a good book you need to do your research well. In that case, wouldnt it have been better to remain at a professional distance to the prisoners? He thought if he could get that little bit closer to them, he could understand them more, know exactly what happened during the night of the murders and what caused them to do it. Well, he got his book. And he claimed to have lost a good friend out of it, though that is up to you when you watch it for yourself.